Sunday, August 31, 2008

What Will Obama Do Now That He's Not The Only Rockstar?




The Republican Party, ya know - that stodgy thing for old people, has just stolen and will continue to steal the revolutionary and rockstar thunder that once belonged solely to Barack Hussein Obama. By the time Election 2008 rolls around, Sarah Palin - whom you'll notice I selected as McCain's should-be VP pick days before her announcement - will be America's new buzz and leave Barack Hussein Obama in the dust as old news. So what does Sarah Palin have that McCain does not? Well, that would include experience, bi-partisanship, beauty, directness, tenacity, authenticity, humor, and an all American homestyle feel - she's an absolutely incredible person that will leave Barack Obama looking like an unauthentic overeducated sop.

Liberal pundits are already knocking Sarah Palin for a lack of experience, even though ironically she has about as much experience as the Democrats' top ticket guy. However, Barack Hussein Obama is a measly do nothing Senator in a measly do nothing Democratic Controlled Senate. As Mike Huckabee correctly pointed out, Senators pick one or two pet projects and pretty much do nothing. A governor, however, is an executive in an office that's much like the micro-scale of the presidency. The governor must make tons of prudent executive decisions in one day that can have lasting effects. The governor gets as much executive experience in one day of the office than one gets in one year in the Senate. Barack Obama has no experience as an executive - he's either sat in a big office or a big Senate Chamber spewing out his do-nothing rounds of intellectual snobbery.



Sarah Palin, a heartfelt fighter that cares about government working for and being accountable to the people, has had a tremendous amount of executive experience in ways that exactly counter the ways that Republicans in the Executive and Legislative branches betray the philosophy of their party. Her record shows her as a clear fighter against special interests and pork-barrel. In her short tenure, she's worked tirelessly to get corrupt politicians (often from her own party) removed and vetoed loads of wasteful spending. She was an ardent opponent of Alaska's "Bridge to Nowhere".

In case you haven't noticed, Sarah Palin is a babe. She might be the first president that will ever be masturbated to. She's nice, and puts off this soccer mom MILF vibe/imagery that will send guys in this country nuts. For the sheer rockstar appeal, people who think outside the political establishment might have a choice between the first cool black guy to run or the first soccer mom babe - giving people options. She's also a fun bubbly person that people will like. Outside of that superficiality, Sarah Palin is authentically one of the nicest, caring, and non-self serving people in America and likely in all of politics. However, she will fiercely take down any opponent that she does not believe has the best interests of America (aka, their own selfish political interests) in mind. In addition, she has a propensity for these one line zingers that simply sting and shut down her opponents. Women will admire her power, her authenticity, and hopefully elect McCain/Palin so their daughters can see that someone who grew up normally like themselves truly have a shot at being America's president or VP. Most women in America, except hardnosed liberals, are more concerned about having a woman VP that cares about family interests than they are with abortion-on-demand.

Barack Obama doesn't feel authentic to the American people because he speaks above them (the intellectual snobbery of which I regularly speak). Sarah Palin speaks to them, and is one of them - while still being brilliant and tenacious. She didn't go to Columbia and become a politican through rockstardom and intellectual snobbery. She's a true American Dream story - a normal woman who wants change for her kids, for their generation, and starts from the very bottom and rises to the top with consistent hard-work and an authentic desire for the common good that voters recognize - her extreme popularity in Alaska speaks to this. In regards to her abortion stance, Sarah Palin is uniquely pro-life not because she's a religious zealot or doesn't value women's rights, but because she earnestly cares about the sanctity of all human life. Despite knowing her latest son, Trig, was going to have Down Syndrome, she refused to have an abortion and will likely love him as much as her other kids. Her socially conservative credentials will be more accepted in the mainstream because they seem to be issues she authentically cares about as opposed to carefully crafted political calculations.

Sarah Palin is America's true maverick, and represents true hope and change for America. Not Barack BG (big government) Hussein Obama.


Thursday, August 21, 2008

Veepstakes: J. Sidney McCain vs. B. Hussein Obama

J. Sidney McCain's Best Selections:


Sarah Palin

Sarah Palin is the younger, attractive, extremely smart, sensible, and practical female governer of Alaska. In this election where America wants to see "change", McCain's selection of Palin would certainly represent "change" and show that McCain is a politican that certainly believes in "change". Palin represents a similar change that can be had with a Lieberman ticket, except her reasonably conservative credentials will not cause any defection of the party base (except a few rednecks who couldn't fathom the idea of a woman president). Should B. Hussein Obama select a white male politician as VP, McCain's selection of Palin would make him seem real progressive and be the real agent of change - a severe embarrassment to Obama. In addition, Palin would help John McCain seal the Hillary women and moderate Democrats - the lucrative 20-30% of Hillary supporters who say that they will refuse to support a B. Hussein Obama ticket.



Joe Lieberman

Lieberman shows America that John McCain is really serious about killing the establishment and not being a whore to devisive partisan politics. Lieberman is a practical pro-America politican who very much represents America's center. If you look at all the states in play, it seems the margin of victory will be decided narrowly by the center. As for Republicans claiming they will defect or not come out to vote, it simply is an empty threat. Any Republican with half a brain will accept Lieberman as a low-position VP who can't really do much anyway over the potentially devastating President B. Hussein Obama. The rednecks that have trouble with Lieberman's abortion views are already dead-set against having a heavy abortionist named "Hussein" getting near the white house. They'll come around.



B. Hussein Obama's Best Selections


Evan Bayh


I would vote for Evan Bayh. Being a somewhat hefty Republican, I think that says a lot. While Bayh certainly will not get me on board with a B. Hussein Obama ticket, it might get a decent amount of moderate/centrist Floridians, Ohioans, Pennsylvanians, Nevadans, and dare I say, uh, "Indianians" (haha). Without those, B. Hussein cannot expect to win the electoral college. Should you need background, Evan Bayh is a very reasonable, practical, and centrist New Democrat coalition member who could possibly make B. Hussein Obama look like less of an appeasement communist hack.




H. Rodham Clinton

The liberal media doesn't want to tell you that the Democratic Party is divided. However, it is, and the selection of H. Clinton will work to heal those wounds. Also, some regard B. Hussein Obama as too far from the political establishment, and too much change will result in an inability to play Washington. However, we all know that Hillary Clinton and her dirty weasely claws sure know how to play Washington (as well as B. Jefferson "Is My Peepee Out?" Clinton).


My Selections

• McCain/Palin

• Obama/Bayh






Sunday, August 10, 2008

The Time Has Come to Mobilize Against America's Greatest Threat: B. Hussein Obama


What was any small credibility the Democratic Party ever had left had been totally eradicated by the nomination of B. Hussein Obama.

In their worst scheme to date, the Democrats have developed a dangerous religion - a dangerous cult. A cult designed to mystify and awe based on idolatry and superstardom. One, that like a cult, preys on people's greatest fears in a cyclically slumping economy. One that sells indulgences in the form of votes. One that exploits a fragile American condition by convincing America that the empty promise of "Obamatology" is real. The Democrats, being mostly comprised of Atheists, have actually found their God in the form of Barack Obama. One that has actually convinced a severely delusional America that he can move mountains, and unlike anybody else, can part the murky seas of and impart change upon the unnavigable waters of the red-tape and bloated partisan and processed American government.

Barack Obama is absolutely nothing except a Hollywood actor in the grandest psychological and sociological engineering hoax in America's history. Never has their been a time when someone so politically insignificant and so out of touch with American values been elevated to the point that he has a 50/50 shot of winning the US presidency. Elements used to build and engineer this God like cult of Obama include visible worship by the liberal media, white guilt, youth/sexuality, the power of imagery, the erection of a Hitler like cult of personality, and utilization of Obama's powerful Hitler-quality speaking skills.

In order to cover up their magnificent ruse, the holy engineers of Obamatology are claiming that Obama's groundbreaking surge in popularity can be attributed to Obama having an all around parallel to JFK. Unfortunately, Obama is no JFK. The core difference being that JFK believed in and wanted to build upon American values, whereas B. Hussein Obama believes in and wants to build upon European values. JFK believed in economic freedom and free markets. JFK believed that a mighty American military is the greatest peacekeeping force in the world. JFK believed in the might of every American - every American as equal - and decried affirmative action. JFK was a proponent of the death penalty. JFK's wife was the classiest lady in the world, not a horrid "for the first time I'm proud of my country" secular-progressive barbarian. JFK would have been tossed out of today's Democratic party.

JFK's intentions were noble in Bay of Pigs. JFK would have railed against the horrific Hugo Chavez. JFK loathed communism, obviously. Vietnam? Russia? JFK also did not go all "good night and good luck" and refused to condemn Joe McCarthy's noble anti-communist crusade. Obama, while not an "out" communist, keeps regular company with and is heavily supported by groups and persons with heavy communist sympathies. Need I mention who moveon.org, the Daily Kos, Hugo Chavez, Susan Sarandon, and Danny Glover support? You can smell the secular-progressive stench conspicuously oozing from B.O.'s pores day by day.

Obama believes in a free market blend. What the hell is that? Either the market is free or it isn't. And it sure isn't going to be any freer with public school unions and other various unions requiring payback after they've put so much money in the coffers of Queen Obama. Not to mention the recent pro-union business climate bill that Obama is trying to push through Congress. An America controlled by labor is extremely dangerous. Foreign investment has already pulled out enough. Do you want to see it pull out further and watch our economy crumble? A healthy business climate is based on a fair free market wage - when unions demand that their workers are paid more than the market will bear, prices get thrown out of whack, the market gets thrown out of whack, and the whole system comes crumbling down.

Obama's inital position on the military invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan is dangerous. In other words, when he had no evidence that miliary action was not required and not appropriate, he still chose to break with 99% of his colleagues (and side with Barbara Lee, the most dangerous politican in America), and opposed the invasions because he is simply an anti-war Code Pink liberal pansy fruit. What happens the next time when military invasion happens to be the prudent course of action? Can we trust Obama to not be his self-demonstrated form of Code Pink pansy? I think not.

And here's a fabulous reality for you! What if they rename "New York's John F. Kennedy Airport" to "New York's Barack Hussein Obama International Airport"? It will rival the King Abdulaziz International Airport in Jeddah and the Al Maktoum International Airport in Dubai. Wouldn't it be even funnier if the guy that orders the signage for the airport accidentally orders an extra "S" instead of a "B", effectively naming the airport "New York's Barack Hussein Osama International Airport"?

I've mentioned Obama's dangerous positions in my previous posts, but his cult of personality is what's most dangerous and most urgent - and we must mobilize the country to counter this dangerous cult. With an almost God like international admiration, he could have the ability to persuade the US and the world to move closer to a dangerous moveon.org and CodePink mentality, which despite a fradulent cover as a moderate, form the cornerstone of B. Hussein Obama's political sympathies.

JFK is rolling over in his grave.

Australia


Australia - no doubt that this was the most important and best trip of my life. As many of you know, prior to this summer I had been to five out of six of the "inhabited" continents, and never thought I'd make it out to Aussie land so soon. I considered my going to Australia, my sixth continent, a significant lifetime achievement, something that if I died tomorrow might be said about me in a eulogy. The world is a big confusing place and there's an incredible sense of accomplishment and awe over going to every corner of it. It helps you both understand more about other people and ourselves. The idea of "ourselves" as a worldwide people would have been laughable to me just in the California bubble. Also, I guess I've always had a fascination with people - maybe it's because I can't relate to them very well so I have to see and analyze to help me understand.

Another part of the travel is escaping temporary problems in life - or what I perceive to be problems and less fortunate people would view as minor puny setbacks, like Donald Trump's ice division of Trump Corporation going under. I'm such a brat - when guys my age are living in cardboard boxes, hustling for a living, or rotting in rehab, I'm whining about a little bit of nothing.

Anyway, back to Australia.

Melbourne
For my sixth floor roomies, I can report that I got to see our favorite Australian ever, a Miss Anna Jaffe. I can also report that Anna is doing very well. She's as resplendent as ever, even though she won't ever say so. As usual, Anna dodged my picture taking, much like she did around Berkeley. She also was embarrassed by my being so touristy with my huge camera, and demanded I invest in a new one. Anna was also infuriated when I attempted to do a "Steve Irwin"-ish Australian accent - she issued her usual death threats :)

I had the pleasure of being taken around St. Kilda and various parts of Melbourne by Anna and her friend "Procle". Between Anna, Procle, and my Sephardic Jew curls, our presence was like just another day at Temple. Anna and Procle also were mindblowing specimens of this incredible Australian banter and sarcasm we've been hearing about so much in the states. It was a beautiful, constant back and forth sort of "language". As we all know Anna's facility for language, you can imagine how well she performed in the competitive back and forth. If you can imagine anything much the opposite, envision a couple of elderly country folk in the back woods of Tennessee talking about mundane straightforward things in a turtlesque voice. Procle also accused Anna of being "demanding", which of course Anna vehemently denied. Anna was in fact extraordinarily generous, especially allowing me to be so touristy and treating me near the entire day at her insistence.

Some cool things we did included Anna forcing me to drink coffee, despite my strong distaste for the mudlike liquid. She then described how Australian coffee is far superior to any coffee found in the states. Apparently it's not about the beans, but all about the "process". We also went to Luna Park in St. Kilda, which has this legendary mini-Colossus like roller coaster that gives you great views of the beach and St. Kilda. Then the beach. Then a 90 story tower in Melbourne. And a casino...by the way, Anna has developed a severe gambling problem (just kidding Anna). Anna misses you guys, and for Christina, guys and girls. It was an amazing day - thanks again Anna.


Sydney
Absolutely incredible city, just incredible. There's a special feeling that you get being in Sydney that is indescribable. Anyway, I just did the main touristy things, like the Harbours, Opera House, all the requisite buildings and sites, Olympic Park, the Blue Mountains, and Taronga Zoo. Despite all these sites being amazing, what was really incredible for me was just the feeling of being in the city. No other city has quite capitvated me like that before.



Travel Experience/Routing for Qantas and Delta
Los Angeles-Melbourne (747) 23JUL 11:40P-25JUL 7:30A
Melbourne-Sydney (737) 27JUL 6:00A-7:20A
Sydney-Honolulu (763) 30JUL 7:45P-30JUL 9:30A

Qantas was an incredible travel experience from LAX-MEL. Incredible service, incredible entertainment, incredible food, incredible goodies, and the incredible experience of once again flying on a 747 (which I haven't done for a good few years, and not with regularity since flying to New York on Pan Am). It was also extremely strange boarding an international flight right in Los Angeles. I'm so used to having to go through a Delta "gateway" like Atlanta or New York to get somewhere important and global. I also got to experience the "disappearing day" that happens when you cross the international date line overnight

MEL-SYD included a full small breakfast in coach for a 1 hour flight. Wow. After that, I was treated to the beautiful airport that is Sydney's Kingsford Smith.

SYD-HNL was nice. No in-seat entertainment, but still a nice flight.

HNL-LAX connecting on Delta. Late as usual. Finally in first class though, and great service, working in-seat entertainment, and what I thought was a great meal.

The End
I thank God for every one of these incredible experiences. It is such an amazing gift and I'm grateful I've been able to see all that I have so far.
Melbourne:

Wednesday, May 14, 2008

B. Hussein Obama and the Donkey Dilemma


As I've long predicted, America would come to understand the true nature of B. Hussein Obama and toss him aside like the elitist (however not nearly as douchebag) John Forbes Kerry-esque snob that he is. Since America was too stupid to analyze his ultra-left voting record, it took a revelation of a twenty year relationship with a disgusting ultra-left and ultra-racist pastor (who thinks the government manufactured the AIDS virus to dispose of minorities) for Americans to realize that B. Obama is a liberal nutcase. Furthermore, B. Hussein Obama really must think we're quite stupid for believing that he never knew his pastor had these racist anti-American sympathies and that he conveniently was not at church when Wright was incessantly spewing his filth. And did I forget to mention B. Hussein's horrid patronizing comments about normal Americans clinging to guns and religion to assuage their economic problems? His contempt for normal non-San Francisco secular progressive snobs is disgusting.

Now the Democrats are having quite a problem and I'm enjoying it very much; they wish they could take back their ballyhooing over B. Hussein Obama now that America has figured out how politically and personally revolting he is. Unfortunately for them, they've electorally puffered up B. Hussein Obama to be their nominee and have found out that my precious H. Rodham Clinton is so much more mainstream and electable (evident by H. Clinton trouncing McCain in the most recent polls by 9%). They've found out that America does not elect radical anti-American red diaper babies. Not to mention one that has next to no experience.

Liberals love to attack their B. Hussein Obama opponents for being racist and not fulfulling their white guilt obligations, but the truth of the matter is that Obama is not black. Obama is genetically 50% white; his mother was a pale far-left secular progressive communist loon from Kansas. Saying Obama would be the first black president ever is like saying I would be the first Hispanic president ever because I'm 50% Latin American - it's simply not the case because I'm functionally white. Obama is in fact less black than he is Arab. He looks very much like an Arab coming from a region that straddles the Northeastern part of equitorial Africa and looks nothing like regular African-Americans. He is also culturally white - despite his dalliances in Chicago, he is a fundamental product of Honolulu and Indonesia, where there are no African-Americans to be found.

Here's another thing that everyone in America is totally onto him about - he is not a Muslim - but an Atheist. His grotesque secular-progressive snobbery is characteristic of no one else but a liberal atheist (likely from San Francisco). Good decent hardworking Americans can smell an atheist from a mile away. I wonder if Obama clings to his "religion" because of any economic and class hardship? Or maybe he's praying for God to stop making his wife and pastor be such deplorable loudmouths?

Speaking of which, what is B. Hussein Obama going to do about his horrible wife who spews anti-American profanities so un-judiciously that it would make Teresa Heinz Kerry blush? Hey Michelle - do ring me when your proud of America again. Resident New York Times bitch Maureen Dowd kind of hit the nail on the head about the uncouth and unacceptably sassy Michelle Obama:

"I wince a bit when Michelle Obama chides her husband as a mere mortal — comic routine that rests on the presumption that we see him as a god ... But it may not be smart politics to mock him in a way that turns him from the glam JFK into the mundane Gerald Ford, toasting his own English muffin. If all Senator Obama is peddling is the Camelot mystique, why debunk this mystique?"-Maureen Dowd, New York Times

The Democrats better get their act together, dig their heads out of their asses (no pun intended), and get Michigan and Florida's electoral votes to throw the nomination towards rotund and glorious Hillary Rodham Clinton. America is a wonderful place, and will not be duped by the likes of a Barack Obama secular-progressive atheist who seeks to restructure our marvelous enterprising free market economy into his vulgar brand of multiculturalism/racism and European Socialism. The Democrats are moving towards these sympathies - and they will not win in America unless they find candidates that dismiss their new brand.



Wednesday, April 9, 2008

Since When Did Democrats Have a Monopoly on Cool?


It seems like everytime we enter a new level of schooling, there's always a new chic thing that we are required to do. In elementary school, it was purchasing a sexy new Sonic the Hedgehog lunchbox. In middle school, it was ensuring that part of one's belt was hanging down at least nine inches below the wasteline. In high school, it was having sex and at least pretending that you were doing drugs.

In college, it was becoming a liberal.

Parading around like a hippie, excusing terrible behavior with moral relativism, and spouting out these ridiculous self-righteous platitudes about "supposedly" disadvantaged groups somehow became the cool thing to do upon entering college. New freshmen, oblivious to how to behave or what kind of personality to adopt, somehow decide to become idealist brooding liberals. Oh, and did I mention a requisite clueless fawning over B. Hussein Obama? It must be his drug use, provocation of white guilt, and his anti-"garlic-nosed Italians" pastor that the kids find cool these days. Cause who likes Italians anyway? Take a ride on Alitalia and you'll never want to see another Italian again - trust me.

Anyway, I'm here to say that the liberal monopoly on "cool" can end. How, you ask? Well, by exploiting assets that Republicans inherently have that can be spun into incredibly cool and incredibly sexy forms.

Liberals foster a culture of community and dependency, where stereotypically you have losers in government homes wasting away and feeding off welfare checks, robbing hardworking people who want to buy a jet ski, a BMW, and a sweet ass little condo in Tahoe. Conservatives are champions of economic freedom and independence - the ideal of the hardworking individual rising up and working hard in the marketplace. I believe they call it "Dirty Sexy Money" over at ABC - money is sexy and everybody knows it.

Also, it's just not cool to think of fat ugly wasteful usurping bureaucrats sitting in a bland goverment office robbing wealthy people from sexy Southern California who would rather spend their hard earned money on cool things like Hummers, fake boobs, and tanning salons which we can relish on hip modern shows like The Real Housewives of Orange County. Phew, that was a long sentence. Liberals love their fat bureaucrats that can't be fired despite severe incompetence. They love to waste our money with bloated inefficient government programs that foster dependency and worsen motivation for "disadvantaged" groups to be successful in a modern marketplace.

And we sure as hell all know that conservatives are much more attractive than liberals (in general, and we all know that that drug addicted psychopath Kirsten Dunst is gaunt and ugly; so is her Prius). Why is it that at Berkeley, severe liberals seem to be these gross gaunt complaining smoking tattooed emo chicks and these pathetic skinny odd looking whiny guys who robotically recite regurgitated lines about imperialism and the oppressed? I get bored by these nutcases in our trees. Whining about Iraq was so totally last year. Apparently now it's all about bailing out a bunch of idiots who don't understand the dynamic nature of the real estate market and want others to take responsibility for their impudent decisions.

And as for severely under-educated Hollywood actors glorifying liberalism by spewing these ridiculous inane comments that rival the Berkeley population in their stupidity, they're totally uncool. Also, what credibility does Hollywood have when half of it is in rehab and have marriages that last about as long as Rosie O'Donnell's bowel cycle. Does Kiki Dunst understand complex market theory? I don't think so. Kiki understands that the economy should work in a fashion where we tax rich people so much - to give back to the poor, of course - that the poor become equalized with the rich. Kiki, of course, fails to understand that if you force rich people to live like everybody else, they - um - kind of have no incentive to become rich in the first place. Then, without reward, nobody's rich, we get no innovation, and there's no money to redistribute to the poor because nobody's incentivized to innovate and output.

Younger, flashier, and edgier conservatives like me are parting with the stuffy religious right while still appreciating a slight glaze of moral values; there's nothing more grotesque and unclassy than an unbehaved demoralized liberal in its drug laden habitat. To highlight, the very sexy, rich, etiquette-laden, and edgy Heidi Montag has recently endorsed John McCain. In contrast, uneducated barbarians like Roseanne and Kanye West are endorsing Hillary Clinton and B. Hussein Obama, respectively.

And finally, Republicans kick the bad people's asses (get it done baby) while pussy liberals retreat behind Michael "Double Quarter Pounder" Moore and his silly misinformed glossy selectively edited movies. We are the America "300" - conservatives will not retreat against filthy radical deranged terrorists. We prefer to save those 53 million people and restore their freedoms from Xerxes - oh I mean Saddam and Osama Bin Laden. We are proud, strong, and shining at the top of a hill. And no, we don't need a bunch of weak secular humanists in the UN telling us what to do.

Might I also mention that the anti-military/Iraq film Stop-Loss was an absolute bust at the box office. Apparently a movie that explores defying one's duty to the US Military is - what Democrats? - quite unpopular! Who would have thought that any film that loaded with beefcake guys like Ryan Philippe could do so badly? In The Valley of Elah, Lions for Lambs, and that other anti-American movie with Reese Witherspoon and Jake Gyllenhaal (that apparently no one knows about) have also bombed very heavily at the box office. In contrast, Mel Gibson's The Patriot made about $115M at the box office and his Passion of the Christ made bank upwards of $300M.

And finally, the environment. These smelly "green" hippies, who ironically smoke and pollute the direct environment around them, are totally uncool. They're gross, and no one wants to be around them. The more sophisticated brand name douche of environmental liberalism, Al Gore, is boring and fat (also insane and alarmist). And need I mention the Prius and those who drive it? I think not.

Conservatives are amazing. We are "the party of the rich", we're glossy, we're cool, we have values, we hate hippies, we hate people that hate the US, and we're totally on Team Heidi. Liberals simply can't beat that!

Sunday, February 10, 2008

Conditional Support of John McCain; Must Defeat B. Hussein Obama














Conditional Support of McCain

So much to the chagrin of my more conservative friends and acquaintances, I have relucantly decided to support Yon McCain. You'll notice I say "Yon" McCain, because I believe McCain will capture an even larger slice of the crucial Latino vote than President Bush (who I think got about 40-44% in 2004), and will henceforth be called "Yon"; I asked my Aunt to say "John McCain" this weekend and she said "Yon McCain", so I said, hell, I'm going to call him "Yon" McCain from now on. Anyway...

You see, most Latinos frankly don't trust blacks (just ask one of the gangs in Los Angeles) and they don't totally trust women in positions of power (despite the so called "love" for the Clinton machine, and they're aren't many deep South American Latinos in the US), so the only real choice for a good number of Latinos will be the immigration friendly McCain. It's not to say Latinos are bad or to blame for this, as it's an intensely cultural and inherent thing (especially to not see these groups in positions of power), but to not risk offending Latinos, this is what the news media and political analysts are too afraid to say aloud, and what the politicially correct pigeonholers do not want to acknowledge. I'm Latino (okay, half, whatever), so I should know.

To reiterate, I support John McCain not because I have any racial or gender concerns of Obama or Clinton - I simply like his politics better. And I bring up the Latino and politics issue to highlight why I think McCain will get more Latino votes and win the presidency. Conservatives loathe McCain mostly for his immigration policies - it's not because their racist (as they're lambasted by the hard left), but they can't fathom our country not being a sovereign country (like nearly every other country on Earth) and folks with illegal status crowding US hospitals and overloading schools funded with their taxpayer dollars. It has nothing to do with race - if Mexicans looked like Swedes or Gingers, the same people up here would still be pissed.

However, I believe McCain will take measures to fully secure the Southern United States border, but will take a rational (and not necessarily conservative) approach to amnesty that's not quite as liberal as his previous foray that was supported by President Bush. Too many conservatives whine about paths to citizenship and what not, but something reasonable has to be done. And too many liberals are overzealous for open borders and amnesty because they think they'll add to their voting base and exploit Latinos more than they already have. Liberals would turn on minorities so quick if they stopped voting for them - they like to dole out gratuitous handouts to secure loyalty among these groups. Conservatives would give these groups the independence they deserve and would refuse to patronize them, infantilize them, and buy their loyalty as liberals do; it's also imperative to note that most minority groups are extremely socially conservative.

I also believe McCain would do an "okay" job at implimenting conservative economic principles. Firstly, McCain would hopefully as he's said keep the Bush tax cuts permanent, putting money back into the hands of people who willingly spend in all branches of our economy and grow it. As much as the concept of low taxes actually bringing in more revenue to the government is so spellbinding for liberals, the leftist associated press admittedly recently that government revenue is at an absolutely all time high (high taxes stifle business, spending, and growth therefore shrinking the economy, and thus the government brings in less revenue); despite the gloriousness of Reaganomics, I'll save that for another blog. Secondly, McCain would hopefully stick to his anti-pork barrel pledges, and unlike President Bush, not be afraid to whip out the veto pen so our taxpayer dollars aren't spent on multi-$100M bridges to nowhere. And if you shrink spending on ridiculous things, you can keep taxes low and shrink the deficits (whose magnitudes are exaggerated, btw). Thirdly, as a Republican, I instinctively think Maverick McCain will tone down the "class-warfare" rhetoric.

His anti-torture and Guantanamo positions aren't too troubling for me, and he'll do a good job in terms of national security and the geo-political arena. As for McCain-Feingold, there's simply no excuse for that.

McCain was not anybody's first choice, but the consequences of not fully backing him and possibly conceding the US to B. Hussein Obama, whose been rated as one of the most liberal Senators in the Senate, are horrifying.

However - the condition - if McCain picks that horrific goon Mike Huckabee of Arkansas to be vice-president, I will refuse to support his campaign at any level as well as during the presidency.






Barack Hussein Obama

B. Obama's record is absolutely troubling, and the nature of his endorsements is terrifying. I will give him credit for a couple more conservative positions (but not conservative enough) on teacher merit pay and healthcare, though. I will also give him credit for being brilliant and "with it". However, the combination of dangerous record and inexperience make him an absolutely unacceptable candidate that must be defeated.

• Endorsed by the dangerous ultra-left and Anti-American "MoveOn.org", which he readily accepted and bestowed praise upon the dangerous group.
• Endorsed by murderer, slanderer, and drunkard Teddy Kennedy (just look up Mary Jo Kopechne on google).
• Refused to say Pledge Of Allegiance as vulgar symbolic gesture.
• B. Hussein Obama's 2006 rating by the Almanac of American Politics describes him as 87% economically liberal and 12% economically conservative.
• Not open to private social security accounts.
• Opposes vouchers or any kind of school choice, however is fine with a type of choice in which a woman chooses to impale the skull of her fetus.
• Socialized health insurance.
• Opposes estate tax cuts, despite those monies already having been taxed.
• His 2006 rating by the Almanac of American Politics (2008) on Foreign Policy is 85% liberal, 12% conservative.
• Irresponsible withdrawal from Iraq.
• Drivers licenses to illegal immigrants.
• Willing to speak to rogue/terrorist states (criticized by H. Clinton)
• Early opponent of Iraq, before it was questionable, showing a far-left Code Pink view of using military force.
• 100% rating from far-left Planned Parenthood and NARAL.
• Hypocritical association with anti-gay pastors in his "40 Days of Faith and Family".
• Rated "F" by NRA.
• Unacceptable levels of disrespect shown to current Commander and Chief President Bush.
• One of the ten ultra-left Democrats to vote NO for Vote 181 to authorize $120M for the funding of the Iraq War and the troops.
• Ultra-partisan in senate: voted 96% with Democrats.
• Voted against bill to prevent desecration of the American flag.
• Voted NO against extension of the Bush tax-cuts.
• Voted NO on confirmation of brilliant and superbly qualified John Roberts to be Chief Supreme Court Justice.
• Polarizing class and race warfare rhetoric.